ProSolution Plus vs Erectin: Control or Support — Which Do You Need?

Affiliate disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you buy through a link on this page, we may earn a commission paid by the manufacturer, at no extra cost to you. That never changes what we publish — and here it means scoring these two products level at 8.5/10 and then explaining why the tie does not make them interchangeable: they were built for two different problems.

ProSolution Plus and Erectin sit side by side in this store, come from the same maker (Leading Edge Health), start at the same $69 price, and carry the same score from us. It is natural to treat them as rivals — but they were built for two different problems. ProSolution Plus is aimed at premature ejaculation — lasting longer. Erectin is aimed at erection support — getting and staying hard, with a lift to sex drive. This comparison puts the two side by side on formula, evidence, timeline, price and guarantee.

Quick Verdict: Who Should Pick Which?

Pick ProSolution Plus if your erections are fine but sex ends sooner than you and your partner want. It is the only product in this pair whose maker-cited study actually measured ejaculation control — and its guarantee covers the two-month trial that study used.

Pick Erectin if the problem is erection firmness or reliability, especially with low drive alongside it. Its trial was run in men with mild-to-moderate erectile difficulties, and its gel-capsule format is the more sophisticated delivery system.

Pick neither yet if your erection difficulties are new, sudden or getting worse — those can be an early sign of cardiovascular problems and deserve a doctor before a supplement — or if you take prescription medication you have not cleared first.

ProSolution Plus vs Erectin at a Glance

What Each One Is For

ProSolution Plus is the narrowest-aimed product in this store. The maker positions it for men aged 21 and over dealing with premature ejaculation — an issue the maker says affects about 30% of men — and its formula, dosing and study all point at that single target: ejaculation control. It is a daily tablet, not something taken before sex.

Erectin's job description is different. The maker positions it for men seeking erection support, its trial enrolled men with mild-to-moderate erectile difficulties, and one of the only two outcomes the maker publishes from that trial is about sex drive. Where ProSolution Plus assumes the erection works and addresses how long it lasts, Erectin addresses whether it is firm and dependable in the first place.

The overlap is real but easy to over-read: the two problems often travel together, but each product was built and tested for one of them. Choosing starts with an honest answer to a simple question: if you had to fix only one thing, would it be lasting longer, or getting and staying hard? Our dedicated pages go deeper on each product: ProSolution Plus, answered and Erectin, answered. Neither product is an on-demand product, and neither treats diagnosed erectile dysfunction — a distinction our overview of what male enhancement pills can and cannot do sets out in full.

Ingredients and Formula Compared

ProSolution Plus names seven components: Tribulus Terrestris, Withania Somnifera (ashwagandha), Asparagus Adscendens, Mucuna Pruriens, Asteracantha Longifolia, Curculigo Orchioides and Asphaltum (shilajit) — an Ayurvedic-leaning list of herbs and a mineral extract with long traditional use around stamina and sexual function, taken as two tablets a day with food.

Erectin names ten: Bioperine (black pepper extract), Chinese Hawthorn, Cuscuta Chinensis, Damiana Leaf, Korean Red Ginseng, Ginkgo Biloba, Muira Puama bark extract, Catuaba bark, Saw Palmetto and Tribulus Terrestris seed extract. The centre of gravity is different — ginseng, ginkgo and hawthorn are circulation-associated botanicals, fitting an erection-support brief built on blood flow, with damiana, muira puama and catuaba on the traditional libido side. Tribulus Terrestris is the one ingredient the two formulas share.

On transparency the two tie, and the tie is not a compliment: neither maker publishes individual ingredient amounts. Both lists are fully named, which puts them ahead of anonymous proprietary blends, but a named ingredient at an unknown dose cannot be checked against research doses. Where Erectin genuinely differs is delivery: its capsules are enteric-coated liquid gels, which the maker says protect the formula from stomach acid and dissolve up to five times faster than tablets. That is a claim about how the capsule releases its contents — it says nothing about how fast results arrive.

The Evidence, Compared Honestly

Both products rest on a single maker-cited study each — still one study each, reported by the company that sells the product, with no independent replication we can point to.

ProSolution Plus's cited study is the more completely reported of the two. Per the maker, 148 men aged 21–60 took the formula or a placebo for two months, with results published in The American Journal of Therapeutics: a 64% improvement in premature ejaculation against 25% for placebo, plus 67% improvement in erectile quality, 48% in sexual function and 78% in overall sexual satisfaction, with partners reporting 77%. Two honest cautions apply. The figures are group averages, not a promise about any individual. And that 25% placebo figure is information, not fine print: expectation and routine move this outcome a long way, which is why the margin over placebo matters more than the headline number.

Erectin's cited study has the stronger skeleton and the thinner report. Per the maker, it was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in 78 men aged 25–50 with mild-to-moderate erectile difficulties — exactly the population the product is sold to, over a longer period than its rival's study. But the outcomes the maker publishes come down to two: sex drive increased by nearly 50%, and 90% of the men on the formula wanted to continue using it. What is absent is the figure you would most expect: no measured change in erectile function itself is quantified in the maker's material.

So the evidence verdict is split along the same line as everything else in this comparison. ProSolution Plus publishes outcomes that match the job it claims to do. Erectin ran the longer, well-designed trial in the right population, then published outcomes about drive and satisfaction rather than the erection measure at its centre. On either product, anyone claiming more certainty than "one promising study" is going past the evidence.

How Long Each One Takes

ProSolution Plus: the maker advises at least 30 days of consistent use, and its study measured results at two months. Judge it the way the study did — a full two months before calling it one way or the other.

Erectin: the maker's evidence was gathered over 12 weeks, so the honest judging window is roughly three months of daily use. Ignore the format confusion: a gel capsule that dissolves faster is a claim about release speed, not results — a 12-week process cannot be shortcut by a faster-dissolving capsule. Neither product does anything tonight.

Price and Value Compared

For a single month there is nothing to choose: $69 each. The differences appear when you price a fair trial and a longer run.

ProSolution Plus publishes no multi-box pricing, so the arithmetic is simple multiplication: the two-month trial its study used costs 2 × $69 = $138.

Erectin does publish bundles: 3 bottles for $177 ($59 per bottle) and 6 bottles for $294 ($49 per bottle), with multi-bottle orders including two bonuses — an erection-health e-guide and Erectin Stimulating Gel. A study-length trial is about three bottles, so the three-bottle package at $177 matches the evidence, roughly $1.97 a day. Per bottle, Erectin gets cheaper than ProSolution Plus in bulk; in total, its longer trial costs more. One dosing caveat belongs in the math: a bottle is a 30-day supply at the starting dose of one or two soft gels a day — at the maker's maximum of four a day, a bottle will not last the month and the monthly cost rises accordingly.

Value verdict: ProSolution Plus's fair trial is the cheaper experiment ($138 over two months); Erectin's is the longer commitment ($177 over three).

The Guarantee, Compared

Both products carry a 67-day money-back guarantee from the same maker, so the difference is not the number — it is how the number fits each product's trial.

ProSolution Plus's guarantee framing matches its study almost exactly: try it for 60 days (two containers), and if you are not satisfied, return the empty containers within 67 days of delivery for a full refund, excluding shipping. Unopened extra containers are also refundable, and the guarantee applies once per customer.

Erectin's terms are equally plain on their own — return the bottles, empty bottles accepted, within 67 days for a full refund minus shipping and handling — but the fit is worse. Its trial ran 12 weeks, which is 84 days. The guarantee expires roughly two and a half weeks before a study-length trial ends. Your practical decision point is therefore around day 60: if by then there is no change you can honestly describe, claim the guarantee while it exists.

Edge on this section goes to ProSolution Plus — the only one of the pair whose refund window actually covers the trial its evidence is based on. On both products, the guarantee lives in the maker's own order system, which is why our product pages link to the official store and nowhere else.

Safety, and Who Should Avoid Each

Neither maker publishes a product-specific side-effect list, and neither study reports a safety profile. That absence means missing data, not proven safety — supplements are not put through drug-style pre-market safety trials, and reactions to multi-herb formulas vary. The exclusions both makers publish are the same list:

• Anyone under 18.
• Women who are pregnant or nursing.
• Anyone taking prescription medication, or with a health condition, without asking a doctor first. If that medication is for blood pressure or your heart, read our checklist on male enhancement pills with blood pressure or heart medication before anything else.
• Anyone expecting instant results. Both makers' own timelines run to months.

Two safety points are specific to the choice between them. First, because neither formula publishes ingredient amounts, nobody can fully audit what a combined regimen would add up to — one more reason "take both and cover both problems" belongs in a doctor's conversation, not a shopping cart. Second, erection difficulties that are new or persistent can be an early sign of cardiovascular problems — a reason to see a doctor in its own right.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I take ProSolution Plus and Erectin together?
Neither maker's material covers combining them, and we would not improvise it. Both are multi-herb formulas with undisclosed ingredient amounts, so stacking them multiplies the unknowns, including interactions with any medication you take. Pick the product that matches your primary problem, judge it on its own timeline, and raise any combination idea with a doctor first.

Which one works faster?
Neither is fast, and on paper ProSolution Plus has the shorter judging window: its study measured results at two months, while Erectin's ran 12 weeks. Erectin's rapid-release gel capsule is about how quickly the capsule dissolves, not how quickly results appear.

Which has the better evidence?
Different strengths. ProSolution Plus publishes a fuller set of outcomes, including a placebo comparison, for the exact problem it targets. Erectin's trial was longer and run in men with erectile difficulties, but its published outcomes are limited to sex drive and continuation. Both are single, maker-cited studies with no independent replication.

What if I have both problems — finishing too fast and weak erections?
You are not unusual; the two often arrive together. Start with the erection side medically: new or worsening erection difficulties deserve a doctor's check for cardiovascular and other causes before any supplement. Then match the purchase to the problem that bothers you most, and judge one product at a time.

Will either of them increase penis size?
No. Neither makes that claim, and no pill does. We answer the size question in full here: do penis enlargement pills work?

Final Verdict

Same maker, same starting price, same 8.5/10 — and not a coin toss, because the tie in score was never the decision. The decision is the problem.

For lasting longer, ProSolution Plus is the pick. It is the only product in this pair built for ejaculation control, the only one whose cited study measured that outcome against placebo, and the only one whose 67-day guarantee covers the trial its evidence describes. Its weaknesses — one maker-cited study, undisclosed ingredient amounts — are shared with its rival rather than unique to it.

For erection support and drive, Erectin is the pick. Its formula leans on circulation botanicals, its delivery format has a coherent rationale, and its trial enrolled the men the product is for. Buy it with open eyes about its two gaps: the maker publishes no erectile-function result from that trial, and the guarantee closes about two and a half weeks before a 12-week trial ends — so your decision point is day 60, not week 12.

And the standing third option deserves its line: if erection difficulties are new, sudden or worsening, the next step is a doctor's appointment, after which either product can be judged on its merits.

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. This article is educational and is not medical advice.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and is not medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before starting any supplement, especially if you have a medical condition or take prescription medication. Individual results vary, and no result is guaranteed.

Last reviewed: October 2026